Legal Trend. Private Property Rights vs. First Amendment to Murals vs. City Ordinances

City: Atlanta

Ordinance: 1982 Ordinance required:

  • registration of public art
  • approvals by multiple layers of city government  for public art
  • defined public art as  any artwork “able to be viewed from a public way.”

Court: City agreed to stop enforcement of a 1982 ordinance and pay $500 in restitution to the property owner and the mural artist. Attorney fees and costs are still being negotiated.

Atlanta Daily Report | City Agrees to Halt Enforcement of Ordinance That Threatened Artwork