Legal TREND. US Supreme Court Rejects Pipeline Quick Take Appeal. 3 Things this means for property rights?

Whats happening? Landowners whose property became a location for a FERC permitted pipeline that allowed for a quick take without compensation since the property was taken 2 years ago.

What does this denial of cert. mean?

  • Institute of Justice says we continue with the current system that “systematically disadvantages property owners whose land is taken for pipeline construction”
  • Law Nerds Say: 5 other circuits have said the same thing, this isn’t an issue for the Supreme Court
  • Industry says:…

Ride Share Laws = Inverse Condemnation on Taxi Licenses?

Arguments FOR ride share laws being the unlawful taking of taxi licenses without just compensation:

  • There is a property value in a taxi license/token
  • Even if there is a property right, is the value in operating the taxi free of others operating similar services?

Courts in FL and IL have said yes there is a property right, but it doesnt grant exclusive rights that would be compensated under the takings clause.

Owners Counsel | Lawprof: “Does Legalizing Uber and Lyft ‘Take’ The Property Of…

Legal TREND. The Next Kelo: Build First, Pay Later Takings

What do I need to know: The US Supreme Court is considering a case concerning a Pennsylvania pipeline built by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company (Transco) and landowners Gary and Michelle Erb

Why is this like Kelo? Its another case brought by the Institute for Justice on behalf of a landowner

Forbes | The Supreme Court Should End Pipeline Companies “Build First, Pay Later” Use Of Eminent Domain

Legal TREND. Property Rights in Private Trash.

Where: Oregon Supreme Court

What: Extended “privacy interests” to garbage left out for collection, for both the bins on the curb & their contents after being hauled away

How did we get here? The police in the case, asked the private company that operated the waste collection service to separate a property’s trash. This amounted to an illegal search by a private comapny acting as an agent for law enforcement.

Didn’t the US Supreme Court say trash was not private? yes, but it allows states to…

Legal TREND. Airspace Easements Taken with Eminent Domain.

What is an airspace easement? an easement taken by an airport 

What did this use of eminent domain give the airport? Access to the land beneath the airspace to trim trees

What legtislative issue emerged in the legal fight? The statute that provides for the Department of Transportation to take land for an airport but does not provide for the taking of land for an aviation easement (the easement for the air space above the land)

The Westerly Sun | Judge declines to dismiss lawsuit over…

Legal TREND. Land Use. Billboards as Campaign Contributions?

Newly filed lawsuit:  Tony Buzbee vs. Sylvester Turner and Clear Channel Outdoor

Why? billboards concerning AlertHouston feature Mayor Turner

Why the campaign contribution argument? According to the attorney, Clear Channel needs the mayor’s help to amend a billboard ordinance. That led to a conspiracy for billboards across the city with Turner’s picture.

Want to read more? The suit was filed April 17 in Harris County District Court, case No. 2019-27094.

Courthouse News | Buzbee files $5M…

Property Rights. Lege TREND. Amending Right to Farm Laws.

LBB 227 (2019 | NE) amends Nebraska’s Right to Farm provisions to fend of nuisance lawsuits brought against farmers.

But, there’s a hitch: there’s a hesitancy to grant immunity from liability to farmers…in Nebraska. What else does one do in Nebraska?

Is there a constitutional issue? Yes, closing the doors to courthouses for nuisances is likely unconstitutional accorind got law professors in Nebraska

Omaha World Herald | Proposed expansion of Nebraska’s Right to Farm Act runs into…

Lege TREND. Repurchase. Anatomy of a 1960s land purchase not used for a public use

Where: California

The public purpose: CalTrans construction of the I-710 freeway

The property taken: residences

What is the repurchase price? The 1963 eminent domain acquired price range from the mid-$20,000’s to mid-$30,000’s. 

How under market value is this? roughly $970,000 under market value

Pasadena Star News | Renters of Caltrans-owned homes in South Pasadena get to buy them $970,000 below market