Rally to Oppose Texas City Taking Auto Shop Property Because Auto Shops Are Not Hip

Where’s this rally taking place? Dallas

Why a rally? An immigrant owned auto shop doesn’t fit a retroactively imposed zoning restriction 

So, what’s the Dallas plan for this part of town? Turn Ross Avenue into a gateway to the city’s art community

Surely the auto shop is being compensated for the retroactive land use limitations that will close his business? No, the auto shop position is that no compensation is being offered in the city’s amoritization process.

Institute for Justice…

Inverse Condemnation Requires Causation. Especially, if Whooping Cranes & River Authorities are involved.

The US Supreme Court let stand a 5th Circuit ruling in favor of TCEQ. Guadalupe Blanco River Authority had sued saying a TCEQ action caused the death of a bunch of whooping cranes. 

GBRA was trying to show a regulatory taking of property, which means something of value had to be taken (whooping cranes) and it was the fault of the government (TCEQ). 

In this case, not so much proof of a regulatory taking according to the courts. A win for TCEQ. A loss for lovers of whooping cranes.

…

Win for Raisins is a Win for Property Rights

Just Compensation for Raisins. Raisins Stand United. California rainsins grew up to be activists that won.

The US Supreme Court ruled in support of raisin producers this week by striking down a New Deal Era provision that allowed the FDA to take a certain portion of raisin crops to control raisin prices. 

The FDA exercised this taking in 2002-2003; opening the U.S. market up to foreign raisins.

Do you know where your raisins come from? The Supreme Court favors them coming from the US….

Land Use Legal Trend: Low Income Housing Requirements. Are these Local Ordinances Inverse Condemnation?

The California Supreme Court this week ruled that developers can be required to provide a percentage of below market cost affordable housing.

Developers had argued that such a requirement was a taking of their property. The Court rejected this argument and found that local governments have “broad discretion to regulate the use of real property to serve the legitimate interests of the general public.”

adminPosted ininverse condemnation, land use, legal trend

Lege Trend: Short Term Home Rentals

California legislature is considering “SB 593, which would require such “hosting platforms” to give cities and counties the addresses of rental residences, the number of nights the sites were occupied and the amounts the renters paid.” 

The big players in this business, Air BnB, and Homeaway, are hiring up. California lawyer types are thinking of it as a new test for the sharing economy- ride share, home share, etc…

How much flexibility you have with using your home &…

Billboards & City of Houston In Talks

Billboards and the City of Houston have a long history. Like a love affair that thrives on disagreements. The love lasts, but it is a roller coaster.  

New movement in this relationship. The City & 3 billboard companies (Outfront Media, SignAd &  JGI) are in talks to address what the city calls, billboard blight. The bargaining chip offered by the CIty: 

  • Voluntary removal of billboards- Keep 1 sign for the next 20 years, if you remove 2 signs.

 

TPPF: Eminent Domain Recommendations 2015

TPPF’s legislative recommendations for eminent domain include:

  • Grant property owners the right to repurchase their property if the initial use of a property acquired from them through eminent domain is not the public use for which the property was acquired.
  • Ban the initial use of property acquired through eminent domain for any use other than the use for which it was acquired. 
  • Change all references to in…

Denton Fracking Ban Leads to Eminent Domain Claims by Mineral Rights Owners

The City of Denton passed a proposition to ban fracking. It’s led to lawsuits to stop the implementation of the ban.

New lawsuits may emerge from mineral rights owners. Mineral Rights owners could assert that the fracking ban ordinance unfairly restricts their ability to use their property. In short, that the city used a form of eminent domain to take their property and didn’t compensate the mineral rights owners for taking away their ability to extract the minerals.   adminPosted ininverse condemnation, land use, legal trend, legislation trend, pipelines/common carriers