- A ball park is neither a public use nor a public purpose
- There is no public benefit of a ball park
- And, if you try to say there is an economic benfit, he’ll throw studies at you to say that is not true
- Taking land from one property owner to give it to another so they can make money is no different than Kelo, and that’s what happened in Arlington
–Richard Galvin is the Betty S. Wright Professor in Applied Ethics at Texas Christian University. Star Telegram | Greene got it wrong on use of eminent domain for ballpark