Background for article: A land owner who was offered less than $50,000 for mile-long swath of pasture and oak trees that abuts the family cemetery, and a commissioners court awarded more than $600,000.
How the article sets up land owners v. energy:
- Landowners claim that not allowing a land owner who prevails to be awarded attorney fees “provides incentives for utilities, pipeline companies and government entities to undervalue properties in eminent domain takings”
- Energy industry argument against allowing for an award of attorney fees is that douing so would “encourage more lawsuits and raise the cost of projects.”
- What’s driving the energy v. land owner rhetoric now:
- Pipelines in the Permuian Basin
- High Speed Rail
Houston Chronicle | Eminent domain fight pits two of Texas’ sacred cows against each other