Legal Trend: Court Limits Pre-condemnation Access for Buckeyes. 5 Points to Know Now & How it Could Happen in Texas.

What isssue was the Ohio Court reviewing? In Ohio, like many states, once an eminent domain petition is filed by the condeming entity, that entity gets the property. It’s called a “quick take.”

Did condeming entities win or landowners? land owners

What did the court say? Cities can’t quick take property for things that aren’t roads. So, no quick take for sidewalks. 

What’s interesgting about the OH eminent domain laws? Ohio limits quick take eminent domain to “making or reparing roads.” The court said if it meant road related purposes, those purposes would have been enumerated.

Does this mean no eminent domain for non-roads in Ohio? Definitely not. It means no quick take of property for purposes other than roads, and that for all other purposes, eminent domain can occur, but immediate possession cannot.

Is this issue percolating in Texas?  Yes, landowners involved in the Pecos Pipeline have sued concerning pre-condemantion access. Other state courts have also reigned in pre-condemnation access in the last 2 years.

The 1851 Center for Constitutional Law: Ohio Court: Cities Cannot Immediately Seize Private Property When Not For Roads 

Trend: Texas Groups Opposed to Eminent Domain by Private Entities. 3 Point Message with 3 Targets

The Texas Wildlife Association via the Hill Country Alliance raises the issue of private companies and eminent domain.

3 Points are stressed:

  • That eminent domain is traditionally only exercised by government officials
  • That eminent domain must have public accountability (elected officials only?)
  • That Texas grants too many entities eminent domain authority. Specifically:
    • gas or electric corporations
    • groundwater conservation districts
    • common carrier pipelines.

Hill Country Alliance : Eminent Domain – Changing the Landscape

Lands of Texas Magazine : Eminent Domain – Changing the Landscape

UPDATE: Houston Church Saved from Eminent Domain.

After a 3 month legal battle, the Houston church, represented by the Liberty Institute, announced that the Houston Housing Authority will not seek eminent domain action against the church’s land.

This leaves unanswered in Texas, which constitutional right trumps- freedom of religion or freedom from of having one’s property taken by the government. As loyal subscribers know, courts in other states have said religion trumps and have denied eminent domain.

Liberty Institute: Houston Housing Authority Calls Off Eminent Domain Proceedings Against African-American Church

Breitbart: BREAKING: HOUSTON ABANDONS EMINENT DOMAIN AGAINST BLACK CHURCH

Private Property Rights. Sharing Economy. Local Ordinance Hoopla.

Home sharing. Homeaway. AirBnB helps the local economy. According to an economic study by AirBnB, direct guest spending from guests accounts for $124 million  in the last year.

Austin ordinance was approved by committee in September 2015. The proposal requires full city council vetting.

Austin Business Journal | Airbnb fights back over Austin’s short-term rental rules

AirBnB Austin Economic Report

Land Rights Draws Droves of Philanthropists . 2 Reasons Why.

Why the draw to land rights? Recently a land rights group won the Hilton Humanitarian Prize of $2 million in unrestricted funding, which set the trend in motion

Why land rights? 

  • “land rights is access to education, food security, gender rights, human rights and then some, all rolled into one issue.”
  • Not owning land is the greatest indicator of poverty

Inside Philanthropy | Land Rights in Poor Countries Is a Hot Cause for More Funders. Here’s Why

 

 

How many homes taken Since Kelo? 20,000 per state. Disparate Impact to Minorities.

Yes, CATO estimates more than 1,000,000 homes have been taken since 2005 Kelo.

How did they get to 1,000,000+ homes if there is no national data base? CATO used the Census Bureau’s American Housing Survey.

CATO says the homes taken fall heavily on minority home owners.

  • 29% African American
  • 32% poor
  • Poor African Americans are 2 TIMES as likely to be displaced by eminent domain

CATO Institute | A Million Homes Taken Since Kelo

Lege trend: Limit Eminent Domain in Power Line Issues

What bill wants to limit eminent domain power in power line cases? Congressmen Boozman & Womack each filed the Assuring Private Property Rights Over Vast Access to Land, or APPROVAL, Act, which would rewrite Section 1222 of the 2005 Energy Policy Act

What is it they want to limit? Federal government eminent domain authority in power line construction.

Why do they want to limit federal eminent domain power? They want to shift leverage to the states in interstate power line construction.

Why is this imporant to 2 guys from Arkansas? There is a regional power line that Arkansas and Missouri have sought to block at the state level because neither state would receive power from the lines. The lines would simply traverse AR and MO. The feds may usurp the state’s power to block the line.

Why is this important to Texas? Mexico de-regulation will lead to power lines built in Texas that bring power to Mexico, and that raises the question whether there is a public use in Texas exactly like the Congressmen from Arkansas are addressing.

Southwest Times Record | Boozman, Womack Speak In Support Of Bill To Limit Eminent Domain