A group of landowners, who filed suit against the State of Texas (TCEQ) for forcing them into a ground water district, were vindicated when the Groundwater district voted 5-0 to allow the landowners to live freely outside their groundwater district.
The landowners alleged in their law suit that they purchased land because it was not in a groundwater district and that private property rights should prevail.
Posted inland use, legal trend, private property rights, water
On Monday the US Supreme Court heard a Texas case about confederate flag license plates, because fans of the Dukes of Hazards are moving to Texas in droves. I haven’t seen any Klingon license plates in Austin- yet, but the Trekkie community is deeply divided and have retained counsel. Seems weird to argue about license plates at the US Supreme Court, but in 1977 the US Supreme Court set forth the idea that a license plate is free speech on private property. The case was Woo… A headline to make make condemining entities cringe. In 2006, Trenton took property by eminent domain. In 2011, Trenton and the property owners reached a settlement and city council approved the pay out. However, funds were never paid to the property owners. This week Denbury filed to seek a rehearing over the appellate ruling that it is not a common carrier. It’s going to pop up via amendment between now and June 1st. Why will this head to the Legislature? Because Denbury alleges that the current legal precendent, the appellate ruling, will have wide spread ramifications. This common carrier fight has spanned 7 years. This complex legal tale includes: More than 7 years ago Jefferson County landowners James … Falconhead golf course, located in suburban sprawl outside of Austin, allegedly owes its water district $778,000. Naturally, legal action has ensued. The clincher is the Travis County Utility District is also considering siezure of the golf course’s property- in the form of its irrigation system. Here’s what happened: No Eminent Domain for Economic Gain is a very popular refrain for property rights supporters. It’s as popular as A/C is in August in Austin. In Nebraska it is a tag line for LB473, which prevents the use of eminent domain by foreign owned pipelines. Foreign owned pipelines would be permitted to negotiate for purchasing easements. Many states are cracking down on the use of eminent domain by private entities.
Posted inlegal trend, legislation trend, pipelines/common carriers, private company, private property rights
“egregious abuse of their power” Isaac for Texas California has been building the infrastrcture for a high speed railway. Property aquisition has caused the following issues:
Posted incompensation, legislation trend, private property rights, railways
Half miles swaths of land near bus and train stops will be under constant threat of eminent domain under language in Connecticut’s state budget. The eminent domain authority would reside with the state and could exclude the use of eminent domain by local governmental authorities. Texans love their private property rights. It’s a toss up who loves Texas private property rights more: Libertarians? Republicans? Ranchers? Cattlemen?Farmers ?Wild Life enthusiasts? This month’s issue of The Cattleman looks at easements for pipelines and power lines. They run through pros and cons, and here they are: Pros of Pipelines and Power Lines Running Through Pastures:Private Property Rights in License Plates?
Condemning Entity Fails to Pay Property Owner
Common Carrier Battle. Round 2000. Danbury Seeks Rehearing Over Court Loss. Countdown to Amendment Flurry.
Local Governmental Entity To Take Private Property. Golf Course Irrigation System.
The No Eminent Domain for Economic Gain Bill
Words Used this Week for Eminent Domain by Texas Legislators
Property Rights Puts High Speed Rail 18 Months Behind onConstruction
Trend: Add Eminent Domain Authority in Transportation Budget
Impact of Pipelines & Power Lines to Ranch Lands