Targeting private entities that have the power of eminent domain, Iowa, wants to require projects to negotiate purchases with 75% of the private land involved in a project before eminent domain can be triggered.
The bill targets a pipeline project and a transmission line project. The pipeline has only been able to neogtiate 50% of the land acquisition while the transmission line has negotiated purcahse of 15% of its land acquisition.
Posted inlegislation trend, pipelines/common carriers, private company, private property rights, process & procedure, transmission lines
On a 92-3 vote, and within 7 minutes, the Iowa House passed an eminent domain bill that: What has Iowans inflamed over eminent domain? A proposed drinking water pond by private developers, “greedy private developers.” Property Rights advocates know no international borders. Property owners on both side of the border raise concerns about the Trans Pecos Pipeline. Here’s what people are saying: Flower Mound City Council candidates uniformly oppose eminent domain for commercial puposes. They uniformly support private property rights saying that emient domain is for public uses only and with just compensation. Cross Timbers Gazette “Paul joined most of the chorus of Republican candidates for governor in opposing eminent domain in the name of public utility for private companies.” Central Kentucky News Iowa joins the band wagon to prohibit eminent domain for private companies. Eminent Domain by a merchant, such as a pipeline who is moving a good to and from, would have a higher level of public use to meet. Blog for Iowa Ojai California is using eminent domain to condemn the water utility that serves its community. Fed up by high water rates, the city opted for eminent domain. Eminent Domain and the judicial system go hand in hand. The private company that operates the private water utility in Ojai, sued. The Second Court of Appeals sided with Ojai that eminent domain allows the taking of the utility so that the the utility can be operated by the local government. The Court went so far as … Missouri is grappling with the Grain Belt Express Clean Line, a transmission line to move wind energy. The majority of county governments and land owners have not approved the transmission line. Right now the transmission line is tied up in the Missouri version of the PUC, and the drama is rising. Ralls County has become engaged in the statewide regulatory approval of the transmission line. The county went so far as to make clear that it has never consented to the the trans… In the West Virginia mountains, a fight is brewing between a pipeline and 100 landowners over access to land. The pipelines say they need access to the land to comply with federal requirements. The landowners say that the access the pipeline wants exceeds what is allowed under West Virigina Law in at least 3 ways: Squeaking by in a 5-4 vote, Senate Transportation Committee passed SB 1601 by Kolkhorst. the bill removes eminent domain authority for high speed rail. The High Speed Rail proponents say federal law, alone, doesn’t provide the tools that will help them to build their rail. 7 Minute Eminent Domain Bill
Mexico-Texas Border Pipeline Has Both Sides of the Border Concerned about Eminent Domain
North Texas City Council Candidates & Eminent Domain. Not Good News for those who like Eminent Domain.
Rand Paul on Eminent Domain. Not Good New for Private Companies.
Lege Trend & Legal Trend Collide: No Eminent Domain for Private Gain
Legal Trend: City to Use Eminent Domain to Acquire Private Water Company
Transmission Lines Incite Eminent Domain Fears. County Denied & Retracts Consent.
Pre-condemantion Access: 100 Landowners Block Pipeline Access. Pipeline Sues. Law Sides with Landowners?
Trend: High Speed Rail Prohibited from Using Eminent Domain