Maine LD 271 (2019 | ME) would:
- tie the use of eminent domain to only projects that offer relaible service
- what does this mean? there must be a direct benefit to Mainers
- if eminent domain increases profits, that cannot justify the eminent domain
Welcome to the Future!
Maine LD 271 (2019 | ME) would:
Massachusetts HB 83 (2019 | MA) would add these constitutional limits on eminent domain:
An amendment to a transportation bill in Ohio would allow utilities expanded eminent domain authority by allowing quick take possession of property.
OH Ag NEt | Ohio Farm Bureau fights expanded eminent domain authority
North Dakota’s SB2344 (2019 | ND) would not permit compensation to landowners for salt water, natural gas, or CO2 recovery storage for the land owner.
KXNET | Landowners Group: Bill would take land rights away
Kansas HB 2317 (2019 |KS) would require transmission companies to provide greater notice to property owners concerning:
The new open communication legislative requirements between transmission companies and neighborhoods is only triggered in:
The Texas Farm Bureau President states his case by riasing these 3 points:
Houston Chronicle | Opinion | Eminent domain works in Texas — for the takers [Opinion]
Where: Texas
Who: Institute for Policy Innovation, 32 year old conservative, free-market policy think tank in Dallas
Why: Testimony concerning SB 421 (TX | 2019) .
What are their 3 reasons to support eminent domain by private entities?
The Texas Farm Bureau poll on eminent domain reform support found:
CenTexProud | Survey: support for eminent domain reform
The Bill: Virginia’s SB 1256 (VA | 2019)
SB 304 (OK | 2019). would prohibit drones over rural lands by:
5 enumerated exceptions for drones operated by:
Landowners could provide access to universities operating weather drones.