Legal TREND. Litigating Texas Kelo Fix. 2 Potential Fixes Heading to a Legislature near you.

In KMS RETAIL ROWLETT v. the City of Rowlett, the Texas Supreme Court this fall heard arguments over whether a road easement in a commercial development project violated the Texas Legislture’s legislative repsonse to Kelo v. City of New London.

The trial court and appellate court agreed that the roadway easement falls into  a transportation exception on the prohibtion against eminent domain for economic development purposes in Texas Government Code Sec. 2206.001

What legislative fixes could…

Legal TREND. 2nd Texas case. I-35 expansion. Jury Award = 8 times TXDOT compensation.

What land was taken? a 9,500-square-foot parcel that for 30 years operated as a salvage parcel

What compensation was given by the state? $65,000 and a new entry 110 feet away and shared by other retailers

What did the jury say?

  • the shared new drive created safety concerns and was not adequate compensation
  • the land ownrs are woed $500,000+

State of Texas v. Skyway Holdings LLC, No. 0015-04-083

Marrs Ellis & Hodge | Owners of Texas Business Win $500,000 Jury Verdict in Eminent Domain Dispute

Kelo Fix loophole. Cities Using Eminent Domain to Boost Revenues? WHERE. WHAT. HOW.

WHERE: Illinois

WHAT: Condemning swaths of property as “blighted” to redevelop the property as higher tax revenue. 

HOW is this happening when Illinois also prohibited eminent domain for economic development purposes? The blight designation in Illinois allows other neighboring, non-blighted properties to also be taken.

KPVI | Some Illinois cities eye eminent domain to boost revenue

Legal TREND. Border Wall. Taking Land from the Diocese.

What? On October 25, 2018 teh federal government notified the Diocese of the taking of 2 properties

Which properties are impacted? La Lomita Chapel & property south of the Juan Diego Academy in Mission

the public purpose?

  • conduct surveying
  • testing
  • investigatory work for proposed construction of roads, fencing, vehicle barriers, security lighting, cameras, sensors and related structures to secure the border

compensation to the Diocese?  initial estimate for reimbursement at $100

What’s the…

Legal TREND. The US Supreme Court & Pipelines

The US Supreme Court may consider the Mountain Valley case.

What’s Mountian Valley about? Landowners are claiming the natural gas pipelines used eminent domain unconstitutionally because land is taken in states in which there is no benefit realized.

How did the landowners fare at the 4th Court of Appeals? landowners lost but because the court’s didn’t have jurisdiction not on the constititional issue.

 Washington Post | Landowners ask Supreme Court to hear Mountain Valley case

Campaign TREND. Eminent Domain Compensation. Governor's Race. $23M eminent domain award.

Which Governor’s race? Nevada

How is eminent domain being used as a campaign attack on the Democratic candidate?

  • The Democrat candidate for Governor owned property that was involved with an eminent domain case concerning McCarren International Airport
  • The Candidate won an award of $6.5 million, + $8 million in interest + $2million in attorney fees
  • Clark County lost all appeals and ultimately paid $23 million

KNPR | Candidate For Governor: Steve Sisolak 

Legal TREND. US Supreme Court and Beach Access. legislative Eminent Domain.

The US Supreme Court has rejected a case brought by a California billionaire to privatize a formally open beach. 

The California Legislature in 2018 budgeted for the use of eminent domain to reclaim public beach acess. After the case had wound its way through California administrative law judges and the California courts which provided fo the use of eminent domain.

Economic Times | US Supreme Court rejects Indian-origin billionaire’s plea for a private beach