Update to No Eminent Domain for Power Lines Legislative Trend. Counter Punch with Economic Boon.

To counter Arkansas’ Congressmen opposition to the Plains & Eastern Clean Line transmission line, which would run through Arkansas but not provide electricity in Arkansas, an economic study was released.

Who authored the economic study?  the Center for Business and Economic Research at UA’s Sam M. Walton College of Business

What economic boon for Arkansas did the report show?

  • 30 month construction period
    • $182 million in labor income
    • $664 in economic output
    • 693 indirect and…

Water Tunnels. Eminent Domain Meets Drought.

California’s Governor Jerry Brown has proposed water tunnels to move water around California.  California farmers have water and the cities need it.

To accomplish this great water migration, California is proposing to use eminent domain against 300 farms to build the 30-mile-long tunnels that will reshape the delta formed by the San Joaquin and Sacramento rivers.

Landowners are facing a 30 day window to either accept or reject 1, single, offer from the state according to…

How many condemnations does it take to build high speed rail?

California is actively building high speed rail. This week the State Public Works Board approved its 246th condemantion resolution since 2013. Fresno Bee

Not only is aquiring land time consuming, but California’s experience is also teaching us that high speed rail is a lengthy process. To move high speed rail along more quickly, the California legislature added a budget rider that will:

    …

How are Interests in Other States Battling Private Property Rights Groups?

Its harder and harder to build insfrastructure in Texas. Tollroads, high speed rails, pipelines are greeted by protestors, private property rights activists, and lawsuits. 

The Midwest has responded with the Midwest Alliance for Insfrstructure Now. It is a coalition of:

  • “agriculture, business, and labor sectors aimed at supporting the economic development and energy security benefits associated with infrastructure projects…

Arguments AGAINST Eminent Domain GROW

Surprise, surprise, more people oppose eminent domain according to an Austin environmental  lawyer.  

Opposition to eminent domain use for a water pipeline that seeks to move East Texas water to DFW has fueled campaign contributions, and court cases related to open records. 

Tarrant Water Campaign is Over East Texas Land: Ft Worth Star Telegram

Trend: County says No to Eminent Domain for Bridge to Oklahoma

This week Grayson County commissioners declined to use eminent domain to rebuild the Carpenters Bluff Bridge. Teh current bridge appears to be either a dirt path or a wooden path, which seems appropriate considering you go back in time when entering Oklahoma. 

A collaborative project emerged. The states are funding a replacement for the 100 year old bridge. The Oklahoma County will maintain the the bill. Grayson County is required to acquire the right of way and is doing so through…

Lege Trend Arrives in Texas: No Eminent Domain for Railroads

In Texas, The Senate Committee on Transportation approved SB 1601 which would deny eminent domain for high speed rail in Texas.

In Minnesota, all railroads may have their eminent domain authority revoked or curtailed by local government approval of projects. Opponents to a rail plan cite problems for emergency responders, increased train traffic, and lower property values in their desir…

Most Popular Texas Eminent Domain Bill

One eminent domain bill is becoming a media darling: HB 565 by Burkett. The bill revokes eminent domain authority from a private toll company.

Here’s why Burkett says it is important: 

  • The problem is a private company overseeing a project with eminent domain authority (hello, pipelines, are you listening?)
  • If property is taken for public needs, it should be “fair and transparent”
  • Toll roads are wearing out their welcome

adminPosted in2015 legislation, activism, fairness, infrastructure building, pipelines/common carriers, private company, private property rights