State Legislation to Allow Eminent Domain for Recreation. 3 Property Owner Opposition Arguments.

Where: Utah

The legislation: Draft amendment 2020FL-0182/013 (2019 | UT)

Property owner opposition arguments:

  • eminent domain is a sharp tool
  • eminent domain is very heavy handed
  • “goes against my belief in private property rights”

What limiting options also failed?

  • limiting the use of eminent domain to large urban areas
  • tax incentives including extending the time to 36 months for reinvestment of any proceeds from an eminent domain purchase

Salt Lake City Tribune | Utah lawmaker floats use of eminent domain for trails but runs into barriers

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *