Lyft has been fighting a law suit over whether its drivers are employees or indpendent contractors. This determination is crucial to determine how much liability Lyft may have if something bad happens or in reimbursing its drivers for expenses.
A San Fracnisco judge denied summary judgment motions and ruled that a jury should determine whther the ride share drivers are employees or independent contractors.
Posted inlegal trend, legislative trend, ride share
A legislative move in California is seeking to level the playing field between ride share drivers and taxi drivers. The bill died in committee last session. This sessions’s Assembly Bill 24 “requires amateur drivers to submit to drug and alcohol testing, undergo criminal background checks overseen by the California Department of Justice and enroll in a Department of Motor Vehicles program alerting employers after DUI arrests.” After passing restrictive local regulations that could cease Uber, Lyft, and ride share operations. San Antonio is proposing revisions that, if approved Thursday, would: California taxi drivers filed suit claiming unequal protection under the laws, because of the unequal regulation on taxi drivers versus Uber/Lyft drivers. The goal: Treat taxi regulation and ride share regulation equally. Uber & Lyft are extremely convenient for passengers. Their ease stems from their apps which quickly bring transportation to you. As a result, Uber/Lyft drivers are glued to their apps awaiting new fares. This focus on the next fare is leading to distracted driving, new laws and law suits. In December 2014, a lawsuit was filed against a Lyft driver when the driver’s Lyft app was open when an accident occurred. In the same month, an Uber driver allegedly hit and killed a 6 year … In December, San Antonio City Council passed new ride share ordinances that effectively shutter Uber and Lyft on March 1st. The ordinances are called the most restrictive regulation in the country. Why? Here’s what the ordinance does: Arizona regulators were ticketing ride share drivers while hey hammered out regulations. Governor Davey put an end to it because ticketing ride share drivers stifles a growing business. The 2 sticking points for legislative negotiators: 1. insurance coverage requirements for ride share 2. regulating safety for passengers What do the laws define? transportation network companies What elements make up a transportation network company? What requirements are placed on transportation network companies? … California DMV issued an advisory that any time a car transports people for compensation, the car requires a commercial registration. Today the Ubers and Lyfts of California do not have commercial registration for their peer-to-peer ride-sharing. Lyft responded by explaining that treating ride share companies like taxis undermines rules established by the California Utilities Commission. In 2013 Governor Brown signed a compromise measure on insurance coverage required by r… A Conroe company, Texas Air Shuttle, wants to be the Uber of the Sky for one flat price per month. Dallas CultureMapLege Trend: Treating Ride Share Drivers Like Taxi Drivers
Uber Update: New Ride Share Regulations on the Agenda for San Antonio
Legal Trend: Taxi Drivers Sue for Equal Protection in Uber & Lyft Operational Areas
Distracted Uber/Lyft Drivers Lead to New Lawsuits & 4 New Legislative Issues
How San Antonio is Trying to Keep Uber & Lyft
Gov. Stops Citations Against Ride Share Drivers
Uber Primer: Rider Share Ordinances & Laws 101
Cali DMV Throws Wrench into Ride Share Regulations. Oh, Uber. Oh, Lyft. Oh, My.
Heard of Ride-Share? Welcome Fly-Share.