TPPF: Houston Ride Share Regulations Move the City in the Wrong Direction

TPPF doesn’t like Houston’s new regulations on ride sharing. Why? Here’s the list of reasons why:

  • expensive for the average consumer
  • create additional costs for local taxpayers
  •  additional background checks and vehicle inspections over and above those already demanded by The Transportation Network Companies [Read: Uber, Lyft et.al.]
  • $600,000 cost to taxpayers fro the City to administer the regulations.

[ adminPosted inlocal, ride share

A Proposition to Remove Cars from the Road?

San Francisco’s Prop A on November’s ballot has the primary goal to reduce the number of cars and car lanes. San Francisco is willing to spend $500 million, in its tiny 9 mile by 9 mile area, to add bike lanes, improve CalTrain down the peninsula, update traffic signals to move buses more expeditiously, and improve pedistrian paths. [SFGate and SF Chronicle]

Breitbart: No Toll Road

A proposed new toll road in North Texas by the Texas Turnpike Corporation has garnered the attention of activists. Lots of activists.

A public forum was shut down by the Fire Marshall. The next public forum included heated and vocal opposition. Last week there was an organized protest by Texas TURF. And now Breitbart, the same organization for which Michael Quinn Sullivan writes, posted in opposition to the toll road. 

Besides the disdain for toll roads, the proposed North …

Austin City Council OKs Ride Sharing

Ride sharing is now regulated by Austin City Council. Taxi companies are not pleased. Refreshing our recollection, the District Attorneys in Los Angeles and San Francisco recently sent ride share companies a list of concerns about the legality of ride sharing.

The legislative and regulatory issues are plenty- properly licensing drivers, background checks for drivers, tort liability issues for injured riders, and the kicker- how to tax ride sharing. adminPosted inlegislative trend, local, ride share