New terminology: intelligent choice architectures

@MIT Sloan introduces us to the new term of art, “intelligent choice architectures.” Intelligent choice architectures are “AI systems that proactively participate in structuring and shaping strategic decisions.”

What makes this so powerful? “their ability to actively learn from outcomes, seek information, and alter the options available to decision makers.”

New report: Infrastructure cyber attack incidents

A new report from Semperis, an identity security and cyber resilience company, found that 62% of water and power operators in the United States and the United Kingdom have been targeted by cyberattacks in the past year, 80% of which have been targeted multiple times. 59% of those surveyed confirmed that cyber criminals sponsored by nation-states were behind the attacks, which experts say could be higher.

More than half — 57% — said the attacks disrupted their normal operations, while 54% suffered permanent corruption or destruction of their data or systems. 

Route Fifty | ‘Living off the land’ a major cyber threat to critical infrastructure, report finds

Is it illegal to put trackers on people?

Pennsylvania Legislature is considering making it a criminal offense to use a tracking device to track someone. HB 407 (2025 | PA) Similar laws have been enacted in Ohio; Florida; and according to NCSL 11 states have created criminal offense for tracking devises.

Route Fifty } PA House passes bill creating criminal offense for tracking device-based stalking

Another social media law bites the dust

An Arkansas judge struck down the state’s social media law that restricts kids social media use and verifies the ages of all account holders. The judge found the law unconstitutional as it violates residents’ First Amendment rights by restricting speech without being tailored narrowly to serve a “compelling government interest.” 

Route Fifty | Judge strikes down Arkansas social media law

Prohibiting AI in healthcare decisions

Add Ohio to the list of states seeking to prohibit the use of AI in healthcare decisions. SB 164 (2025 | OH) ” would provide transparency for patients on the use of AI by health insurers by making sure there is human oversight on whether or not someone receives health coverage.”  The bill author wants accountability for healthcare insurance.

WFMJ | Cutrona introduces legislation addressing usage of AI in healthcare authorization

Viriginia & Texas leading on supporting AI innovation

R Street says that if we want to look for a way to regulate AI without impeding innovation look to Virginia and Texas. 900 bills regulating AI have been proposed in 2025. Virginia Governor vetoed HB 2094 because its “rigid framework fails to account for the rapidly evolving and fast-moving nature of the AI industry and puts an especially onerous burden on smaller firms and startups that lack large legal compliance departments.”

They also say that Texas’ HB 149 (2025 | TX) removed problematic issues that mirrored Virginia’s vetoed legislation.

Governing | More States Reject Fear-Based AI Regulation