Local rules halt data center

St. Louis, Missouri City Council has been considering a local ordinance to pause data center development. Before this could happen, the mayor acted. An executive order has been issued that requires  data center developments to disclose both water and energy use,  job creation numbers, and distance from nearby neighborhoods, and noise pollution.  

Data Center Dynamics | Plans for data center paused in St. Louis amid regulatory changes and local pushback

Open AI announces 5 new AI data centers

OpenAI, Oracle, and SoftBank have announced 5 new AI data center projects this week. This in addition to its flagship site in Abilene, Texas. The new locations include two additional Texas locations: Milam County and locations in Shackelford County, Texas. 

The 3 additional location are Doña Ana County, New Mexico; and a site in the Midwest. These sites are included in the $500 AI investment these partners announced in January. 

Open AI | OpenAI, Oracle, and SoftBank expand Stargate with five new AI data center sites

Quantum, a blue ocean strategy

Fairfax County, Virginia’s support of quantum computing is being called a blue ocean opportunity. Harvard Business Review tells us blue ocean opportunities are defined as “demand is created rather than fought over. There is ample opportunity for growth that is both profitable and rapid.” This means the industries aren’t fully evolved yet. 

Virginia says the only states that are also competing for quantum computing are Illinois and Colorado. You all know this because we started talking about Illinois and Colorado way back in January 2024.

Route Fifty | How quantum became a ‘blue ocean’ opportunity for a Virginia county

Anatomy of the opposition to a state privacy bill

Ah…the Information Age, a time when you publicly do not oppose a data privacy bill, but organize the opposition and believe that all this will remain hidden. A tech company organized opposition to AB566 which amends California’s Privacy Act.  All the while publicly in California the company did not publicly oppose the bill. However, behind the scenes, it emailed business owners across the country alleging that the bill will  “hurt your ability to use online ads to reach customers.” The MarkUp

Curbing catastrophic AI harm

Legislation to curb catastrophic AI harm is moving through NY and CA Legislatures. California’s SB 53 is headed to the Governor’s desk, S6953B. Is awaiting action by New York’s Governor.

The bills seek to “establish rules aiming to prevent the most advanced, large-scale artificial intelligence models — known as frontier AI models — from causing catastrophic harm involving dozens of casualties or billion-dollar damages.”

Arguments calling for a veto include the usual- stifle innovation, patchwork of state laws, liability, and free speech. The NetChoice veto request letter.

Bill regulates AI companion chatbots

California Legislature is close to final enactment of SB 243 that will protect vulnerable users of AI chatbots. California would be the first state to regulate AI chatbots and hold them accountable. We’ve all seen the slew of media on the negative impact of AI chatbots on vulnerable users. This bill would specifically address Ai chatbots engaging in suicidal ideation, self-harm, or sexually explicit content.

TechCrunch | A California bill that would regulate AI companion chatbots is close to becoming law