3 Reasons States Should Act on Cybersecurity Standards

  • Timely. All 6 US Senators running for President in 2020 are cosponsors of cybsercurity legislation
  • History of federal Action. Standardizing cybersecurity practices at the federal level is difficult
  • Agency infighting  is creating disparate standards
  • State Success. State leaders have pushed legislative success to protect its citizens like:
    • TX, IL, WA and MA protecting biometric data
    • OH liability protection law
    • CA version of GDPR

The Hill | Why states should push forward with cyber laws

Lege TREND. Public Private Cyber WorkForce Exchange

WHAT: Cyber Security Exchange Act,”

Bipartisan? Yes, Senators Thune (R) & Klobuchar (D)

How does the Cyber security Exchange work?

  • create an exchange program between the federal government and private firms
  • to bring more cybersecurity expertise to the federal workforce
  • The program would allow for a 2 year tours of duty with the federal government

 

The Hill | Bipartisan bill would create public-private cyber workforce exchange

3 Ways States Benefit from a State Data Officer.

 

  • data helps create more efficient permitting processes
    • CT allows local governments to get occupational licensing data directly form the state
  • overdose data helps first responders and hospitals prepare for epidemics
  • Prevent fraud 
    • IN adopted its Indiana’s Management and Performance Hub to “integrate” data from several agencies to build custom analytics solutions.” Its addressing issues from car crashes and infant mortality to Medicaid optimization.
    • TX shared data across agencies…

Lege TREND. State Control over Local Government Cyber Security. Read the Bill.

 Senate Bill 2110 (2019 | ND) would give a North Dakota state agency, Information Technology Department, the power to:

  •  “advise, oversee and regulate cybersecurity strategy” for:
    • state agencies
    • higher education
    • cities
    • counties
    • school districts

What’s the state argument for a unified cybersecurity approach? the local govenrments and entities are connected at some point to a state network

Local government support? Yes, the North Dakota League of Cities supports the initiative because…

Lege TREND. Top Data Security State Legislation in 2019.

  • California Privacy Act.  Will other states replicate it? Is it the US solution for GDPR?
  • Federal Preemption. Will Congress pass federal data breach notification standards?
  • Data Privacy Requirements for Internet of Things.  Privacy standards for your home thermostat, etc… See California’s SB 327 (2018)
  • Will small businesses get a carve out bill? See S770 (115th Congress)
  • Federal Preemption of Data Encryption Standards for Business

Sc Media | Top cybersecurity legislation of 2019

Lege TREND. Experts speak. What should an ideal data security law look like? 9 quick points

According to lawyers wirting in the Harvard Business Review, a data security regulatory system should:

  • focusing more on systemic ways to address cyber threat
  • not treat businesses punitively 
  • require the federal government to take a more active role in cyber defense
  • require the federal government to share cybersecuity knowledge with the private sector
  • require agencies to “issue pragmatic, cost-effective operational guidance to companies on how to defend against evolving risks”
  • incentivizing…

3 Reasons Government Help Needed to Stop Data Breaches. Businesses Are Victims Too.

 

  • Thinking on these laws is backwards. Laws should switch from punishing coporations to realizing in data breaches, companies are most likely also victims of criminal activity
    • it is not a fair framework to punish companies
    • and it is not effective enforcement
  • Limited cyber experts. It is impossible for “every company in America to have sufficient internal cyber expertise to manage the risk.”
  • The robbery analogy. When a bank is robbed, do we blame the bank? No.

Harvard Business Review…

3 Reasons a State Chamber of Commerce Supported a Data Security Bill

What did the Michigan Chamber of Commerce tout as reasons to support a Data Security bill, HB 6405 (MI | 2018) that required businesses to do certain new tasks concerning data breaches:

  • The Chamber likes a specific time frame to notify affected persons
    • The chamber did not like phrasing, within a reasonable time
  • Is ok with “reasonable mandates” on businesses
  • The Chamber supports “.. a consumers’ right to know that their personal identifying information was compromised”

Michigan Chamber of…