{"id":892,"date":"2017-09-20T20:09:00","date_gmt":"2017-09-20T20:09:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/eminentdomain\/wp-eminentdomain\/2017\/09\/20\/limiting-eminent-domain-use-up-north-what-made-the-cut-t-more-republicans-limiting-local-government\/"},"modified":"2017-09-20T20:09:00","modified_gmt":"2017-09-20T20:09:00","slug":"limiting-eminent-domain-use-up-north-what-made-the-cut-t-more-republicans-limiting-local-government","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/eminentdomain\/wp-eminentdomain\/limiting-eminent-domain-use-up-north-what-made-the-cut-t-more-republicans-limiting-local-government\/","title":{"rendered":"Limiting Eminent Domain Use Up North, What Made the Cut &#038; What Didn&#39;t? More Republicans Limiting Local Government?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Governor Scott Walker of Wisconsin vetoed eminent domain restrictions that:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>limited railroad use of eminent domain<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Governor Walk let stand eminent domain restrictions that:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>prohit the use of eminent domain for recreational trails and walkways<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/lacrossetribune.com\/news\/local\/gov-scott-walker-vetoes-quarry-regulation-restriction-says-policy-deserves\/article_2c2c4505-113e-5f48-a1c4-11c5dff2c7aa.html\">LaCrosse Tribune |\u00a0Gov. Scott Walker vetoes quarry regulation restriction, says policy deserves full debate<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Governor Scott Walker of Wisconsin vetoed eminent domain restrictions that:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>limited railroad use of eminent domain<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Governor Walk let stand eminent domain restrictions that:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>prohit the use of eminent domain for recreational trails and walkways<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/lacrossetribune.com\/news\/local\/gov-scott-walker-vetoes-quarry-regulation-restriction-says-policy-deserves\/article_2c2c4505-113e-5f48-a1c4-11c5dff2c7aa.html\">LaCrosse Tribune |\u00a0Gov. Scott Walker vetoes quarry regulation restriction, says policy deserves full debate<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[49,58,14,40,2,38,25],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-892","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-2017-legislative-issues","category-2017-special-session-1-legislative-issues","category-legislation-trend","category-parks","category-private-property-rights","category-public-use-or-benefit","category-railways","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/eminentdomain\/wp-eminentdomain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/892","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/eminentdomain\/wp-eminentdomain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/eminentdomain\/wp-eminentdomain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/eminentdomain\/wp-eminentdomain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/eminentdomain\/wp-eminentdomain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=892"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/eminentdomain\/wp-eminentdomain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/892\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/eminentdomain\/wp-eminentdomain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=892"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/eminentdomain\/wp-eminentdomain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=892"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/eminentdomain\/wp-eminentdomain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=892"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}