{"id":878,"date":"2017-08-31T21:20:00","date_gmt":"2017-08-31T21:20:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/eminentdomain\/wp-eminentdomain\/2017\/08\/31\/legal-trend-court-finds-unconstitutional-asset-forfeiture-in-the-hoosier-state\/"},"modified":"2017-08-31T21:20:00","modified_gmt":"2017-08-31T21:20:00","slug":"legal-trend-court-finds-unconstitutional-asset-forfeiture-in-the-hoosier-state","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/eminentdomain\/wp-eminentdomain\/legal-trend-court-finds-unconstitutional-asset-forfeiture-in-the-hoosier-state\/","title":{"rendered":"Legal Trend. Court Finds Unconstitutional Asset Forfeiture in the Hoosier State"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A federal judge in Indiana ruled that asset forefeiture of vehicles without criminal charges violates the constitution because asset forefeiture laws:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>failed to provide a timely hearing for the property owner to contest the seizure<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.forbes.com\/sites\/instituteforjustice\/2017\/08\/31\/federal-judges-rules-indiana-seizing-cars-with-civil-forfeiture-is-unconstitutional\/#17da532f3da5\">Forbes | Contributor: Institute for Justice |\u00a0Federal Judge Rules Indiana Seizing Cars With Civil Forfeiture Is Unconstitutional<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A federal judge in Indiana ruled that asset forefeiture of vehicles without criminal charges violates the constitution because asset forefeiture laws:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>failed to provide a timely hearing for the property owner to contest the seizure<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.forbes.com\/sites\/instituteforjustice\/2017\/08\/31\/federal-judges-rules-indiana-seizing-cars-with-civil-forfeiture-is-unconstitutional\/#17da532f3da5\">Forbes | Contributor: Institute for Justice |\u00a0Federal Judge Rules Indiana Seizing Cars With Civil Forfeiture Is Unconstitutional<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[49,45,4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-878","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-2017-legislative-issues","category-civil-asset-forfeiture","category-legal-trend","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/eminentdomain\/wp-eminentdomain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/878","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/eminentdomain\/wp-eminentdomain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/eminentdomain\/wp-eminentdomain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/eminentdomain\/wp-eminentdomain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/eminentdomain\/wp-eminentdomain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=878"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/eminentdomain\/wp-eminentdomain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/878\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/eminentdomain\/wp-eminentdomain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=878"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/eminentdomain\/wp-eminentdomain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=878"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/eminentdomain\/wp-eminentdomain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=878"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}