{"id":534,"date":"2016-04-28T17:58:00","date_gmt":"2016-04-28T17:58:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/eminentdomain\/wp-eminentdomain\/2016\/04\/28\/legal-trend-3-markers-to-support-eminent-domain-from-the-east\/"},"modified":"2016-04-28T17:58:00","modified_gmt":"2016-04-28T17:58:00","slug":"legal-trend-3-markers-to-support-eminent-domain-from-the-east","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/eminentdomain\/wp-eminentdomain\/legal-trend-3-markers-to-support-eminent-domain-from-the-east\/","title":{"rendered":"Legal Trend. 3 Markers to Support Eminent Domain from the East."},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>State courts in which state are grappling with eminent domain for a pipeline over landowner objections?<\/strong>\u00a0Pennsylvania<\/p>\n<p><strong>What 3 considerations did the judge list in approving eminent domain to move forward?<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Declaration of Taking complies with state law<\/li>\n<li>Pipeline&#8217;s condemnation plans are &#8220;sufficient to properly identify the disputed acreage&#8221;<\/li>\n<li>Pipeline is financially stable to pay for any potential damages<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.dailyitem.com\/news\/judge-upholds-eminent-domain-for-ppl\/article_1344ef10-0cff-11e6-aaaa-57b1efbf00cd.html\">Daily Item |\u00a0Judge upholds eminent domain for PPL<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p><strong>State courts in which state are grappling with eminent domain for a pipeline over landowner objections?<\/strong>\u00a0Pennsylvania<\/p>\n<p><strong>What 3 considerations did the judge list in approving eminent domain to move forward?<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Declaration of Taking complies with state law<\/li>\n<li>Pipeline&#8217;s condemnation plans are &#8220;sufficient to properly identify the disputed acreage&#8221;<\/li>\n<li>Pipeline is financially stable to pay for any potential damages<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.dailyitem.com\/news\/judge-upholds-eminent-domain-for-ppl\/article_1344ef10-0cff-11e6-aaaa-57b1efbf00cd.html\">Daily Item |\u00a0Judge upholds eminent domain for PPL<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[9,17,4,6,2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-534","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-compensation","category-easement","category-legal-trend","category-pipelines-common-carriers","category-private-property-rights","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/eminentdomain\/wp-eminentdomain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/534","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/eminentdomain\/wp-eminentdomain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/eminentdomain\/wp-eminentdomain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/eminentdomain\/wp-eminentdomain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/eminentdomain\/wp-eminentdomain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=534"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/eminentdomain\/wp-eminentdomain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/534\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/eminentdomain\/wp-eminentdomain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=534"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/eminentdomain\/wp-eminentdomain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=534"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/eminentdomain\/wp-eminentdomain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=534"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}