{"id":1089,"date":"2018-07-16T21:19:00","date_gmt":"2018-07-16T21:19:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/eminentdomain\/wp-eminentdomain\/2018\/07\/16\/legal-trend-and-lege-trend-are-statutory-distance-requirements-a-taking\/"},"modified":"2018-07-16T21:19:00","modified_gmt":"2018-07-16T21:19:00","slug":"legal-trend-and-lege-trend-are-statutory-distance-requirements-a-taking","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/eminentdomain\/wp-eminentdomain\/legal-trend-and-lege-trend-are-statutory-distance-requirements-a-taking\/","title":{"rendered":"Legal TREND and Lege TREND. Are Statutory Distance Requirements a Taking?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>The distance requirement at issue:<\/strong>\u00a0Prohibiting sex offenders from living within 1000 feet from a school<\/p>\n<p><strong>What did the Georgia Supreme Court say?<\/strong>\u00a0If a child care center opens near a registered sex offenders residence, yes it is a taking.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/caselaw.findlaw.com\/ga-supreme-court\/1404754.html\" style=\"margin:0px;padding:0px;color:rgb(149,79,114);font-family:Raleway, Georgia, Baskerville, Palatino, 'Palatino Linotype', 'Book Antiqua', 'Times New Roman', serif;font-size:14px;\">Mann v. Georgia Department of Corrections,<\/a>653 S.E.2d 740 (Ga. 2007)\u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p><strong>The distance requirement at issue:<\/strong>\u00a0Prohibiting sex offenders from living within 1000 feet from a school<\/p>\n<p><strong>What did the Georgia Supreme Court say?<\/strong>\u00a0If a child care center opens near a registered sex offenders residence, yes it is a taking.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/caselaw.findlaw.com\/ga-supreme-court\/1404754.html\" style=\"margin:0px;padding:0px;color:rgb(149,79,114);font-family:Raleway, Georgia, Baskerville, Palatino, 'Palatino Linotype', 'Book Antiqua', 'Times New Roman', serif;font-size:14px;\">Mann v. Georgia Department of Corrections,<\/a>653 S.E.2d 740 (Ga. 2007)\u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[23,4,14,2,33],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1089","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-inverse-condemnation","category-legal-trend","category-legislation-trend","category-private-property-rights","category-school","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/eminentdomain\/wp-eminentdomain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1089","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/eminentdomain\/wp-eminentdomain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/eminentdomain\/wp-eminentdomain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/eminentdomain\/wp-eminentdomain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/eminentdomain\/wp-eminentdomain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1089"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/eminentdomain\/wp-eminentdomain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1089\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/eminentdomain\/wp-eminentdomain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1089"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/eminentdomain\/wp-eminentdomain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1089"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/eminentdomain\/wp-eminentdomain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1089"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}