Is there a consistent statutory definition of artificial intelligence? No, of course not, can elected officials agree on the color of the sky anymore? So let’s look at 6 different a.i. definitions:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Connecticut SB 1103<\/strong>: An \u201cartificial system that \u2018performs tasks under varying and unpredictable circumstances without significant human oversight or can learn from experience and improve such performance when exposed to data sets.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n Louisiana SCR 49<\/strong>: It \u201ccombines computer science and robust datasets to enable problem-solving measures directly to consumers.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n North Dakota HB 1361<\/strong>: \u201cPersonhood\u201d does not include \u201cartificial intelligence.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n Rhode Island H 6423<\/strong>: It includes \u201ccomputerized methods and tools, including, but not limited to, machine learning and natural language processing, that act in a way that resembles human cognitive abilities when it comes to solving problems or performing certain tasks.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n Texas HB 2060<\/strong>: Systems capable of \u201cperceiving an environment through data acquisition and processing and interpreting the derived information to take an action or actions or to imitate intelligent behavior given a specific goal and learning and adapting behavior by analyzing how the environment is affected by prior actions.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n The National Artificial Intelligence Initiative Act of 2020 <\/strong>sought to define AI, describing it as \u201ca machine-based system that can, for a given set of human-defined objectives, make predictions, recommendations or decisions influencing real or virtual environments,\u201d according to the federal\u00a0law<\/a>, which was enacted Jan. 1, 2021.<\/p>\n\n\n\n