{"id":24,"date":"2014-10-17T16:28:00","date_gmt":"2014-10-17T16:28:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/datasecurity\/wp-datasecurity\/2014\/10\/17\/fl-supreme-court-limits-cell-phone-data-tracking\/"},"modified":"2014-10-17T16:28:00","modified_gmt":"2014-10-17T16:28:00","slug":"fl-supreme-court-limits-cell-phone-data-tracking","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/datasecurity\/wp-datasecurity\/fl-supreme-court-limits-cell-phone-data-tracking\/","title":{"rendered":"FL Supreme Court Limits Cell Phone Data Tracking"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>For a good while law enforcement could obtain cell phone data without a warrant. Its a controversial 4th amendment issue throughout the US, including in Texas.<\/p>\n<p>Florida police had a warrant for calls going into and out of a defendant&#8217;s phone, but the Florida Supreme Court said that warrant did not cover tracking cell phone data to follow the defendant&#8217;s movements. The ruling\u00a0is being heralded as an enormous victory for privacy rights. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.firstcoastnews.com\/story\/news\/politics\/2014\/10\/16\/court-ruling-limits-police-phone-tracking\/17385975\/\">[First Coast News] <\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.wsj.com\/law\/2014\/10\/17\/am-roundup-prosecutors-ask-for-10-years-in-jail-for-pistorius-florida-high-court-puts-limits-on-phone-tracking\/\">[Wall Street Journal]<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>For a good while law enforcement could obtain cell phone data without a warrant. Its a controversial 4th amendment issue throughout the US, including in Texas.<\/p>\n<p>Florida police had a warrant for calls going into and out of a defendant&#8217;s phone, but the Florida Supreme Court said that warrant did not cover tracking cell phone data to follow the defendant&#8217;s movements. The ruling\u00a0is being heralded as an enormous victory for privacy rights. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.firstcoastnews.com\/story\/new...<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2,6,9,3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-24","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-data-privacy","category-law-enforcement","category-legal-trend","category-legislative-trend","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/datasecurity\/wp-datasecurity\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/datasecurity\/wp-datasecurity\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/datasecurity\/wp-datasecurity\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/datasecurity\/wp-datasecurity\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/datasecurity\/wp-datasecurity\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=24"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/datasecurity\/wp-datasecurity\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/datasecurity\/wp-datasecurity\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=24"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/datasecurity\/wp-datasecurity\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=24"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/datasecurity\/wp-datasecurity\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=24"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}