{"id":133,"date":"2015-03-17T15:58:00","date_gmt":"2015-03-17T15:58:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/datasecurity\/wp-datasecurity\/2015\/03\/17\/uber-class-action-lawsuit-for-data-breach\/"},"modified":"2015-03-17T15:58:00","modified_gmt":"2015-03-17T15:58:00","slug":"uber-class-action-lawsuit-for-data-breach","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/datasecurity\/wp-datasecurity\/uber-class-action-lawsuit-for-data-breach\/","title":{"rendered":"Uber Class Action Lawsuit for Data Breach"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A Portland Uber driver is the named plaintiff in a class action lawsuit against Uber for a 2014 data breach.<\/p>\n<p>The breach disclosed personal information for 50,000 Uber drivers. The lawsuit alleges that Uber took 5 months to disclose the data breach, which violates California law. California statutes require employers to protect the personal information of employees.<\/p>\n<p><em>Antman v. Uber Technologies Inc, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, No. 15-1175<\/em>.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.insurancejournal.com\/news\/national\/2015\/03\/16\/360586.htm\">Insurance Journal<\/a>\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.inautonews.com\/us-uber-hit-with-class-action-suit-over-driver-data-breach#.VQhQLUI-AwQ\">InAutoNews<\/a>\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nydailynews.com\/news\/national\/uber-sued-driver-data-breach-adding-legal-woes-article-1.2149852\">NYDailyNews<\/a>\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/fortune.com\/2015\/03\/13\/uber-sued-data-breach\/\">Fortune via Reuters<\/a><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A Portland Uber driver is the named plaintiff in a class action lawsuit against Uber for a 2014 data breach.<\/p>\n<p>The breach disclosed personal information for 50,000 Uber drivers. The lawsuit alleges that Uber took 5 months to disclose the data breach, which violates California law. California statutes require employers to protect the personal information of employees.<\/p>\n<p><em>Antman v. Uber Technologies Inc, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, No. 15-1175<...<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2,9,3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-133","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-data-privacy","category-legal-trend","category-legislative-trend","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/datasecurity\/wp-datasecurity\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/133","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/datasecurity\/wp-datasecurity\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/datasecurity\/wp-datasecurity\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/datasecurity\/wp-datasecurity\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/datasecurity\/wp-datasecurity\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=133"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/datasecurity\/wp-datasecurity\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/133\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/datasecurity\/wp-datasecurity\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=133"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/datasecurity\/wp-datasecurity\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=133"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/datasecurity\/wp-datasecurity\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=133"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}