{"id":1097,"date":"2018-11-30T23:28:00","date_gmt":"2018-11-30T23:28:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/datasecurity\/wp-datasecurity\/2018\/11\/30\/legal-lege-trend-employer-liability-employee-data\/"},"modified":"2018-11-30T23:28:00","modified_gmt":"2018-11-30T23:28:00","slug":"legal-lege-trend-employer-liability-employee-data","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/datasecurity\/wp-datasecurity\/legal-lege-trend-employer-liability-employee-data\/","title":{"rendered":"Legal &#038; Lege TREND. Employer Liability. Employee Data."},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has ruled that employers have a duty to protect employees from cyberattacks by setting:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Employer Duty:<\/strong>\u00a0\u201ca legal duty to exercise reasonable care to safeguard\u201d<\/li>\n<li><strong>Remedy:<\/strong>\u00a0a recovery for negligent behavior under the\u00a0economic loss doctrine<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em>Dittman v. UPMC<\/em>, 2018 Pa. LEXIS 6051 (Pa. Nov. 21, 2018)<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.jdsupra.com\/legalnews\/pennsylvania-supreme-court-holds-33113\/\">White &amp; Williams |\u00a0Pennsylvania Supreme Court Holds Employers Have Duty to Protect Employee Data from Cyberattacks<\/a>\u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has ruled that employers have a duty to protect employees from cyberattacks by setting:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Employer Duty:<\/strong>\u00a0\u201ca legal duty to exercise reasonable care to safeguard\u201d<\/li>\n<li><strong>Remedy:<\/strong>\u00a0a recovery for negligent behavior under the\u00a0economic loss doctrine<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em>Dittman v. UPMC<\/em>, 2018 Pa. LEXIS 6051 (Pa. Nov. 21, 2018)<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.jdsupra.com\/legalnews\/pennsylvania-supreme-court-holds-33113\/\">White &amp; Williams |\u00a0Pennsylvania Supreme Court Holds Employers Have Duty to Protect Employee Data from Cyberattacks<\/a>\u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[23,2,9,3,24],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1097","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-business-trend","category-data-privacy","category-legal-trend","category-legislative-trend","category-private-corporations","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/datasecurity\/wp-datasecurity\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1097","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/datasecurity\/wp-datasecurity\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/datasecurity\/wp-datasecurity\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/datasecurity\/wp-datasecurity\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/datasecurity\/wp-datasecurity\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1097"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/datasecurity\/wp-datasecurity\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1097\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/datasecurity\/wp-datasecurity\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1097"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/datasecurity\/wp-datasecurity\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1097"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/informedintel.com\/account\/datasecurity\/wp-datasecurity\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1097"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}